Scientific American recently released a Podcast series on 'uncertainty in science,' underscoring the idea that uncertainty drives science forward... that 2014 meta-analysis can tell us we're onto something, but subsequent research can refine our theories and models of the 'world' ... but we have to keep our minds open. Loved it.
Yes, this comes from my background in teaching writing & rhetoric 😂 We’re constantly telling students that acknowledging complexity makes them more credible, not less!
Great post. This makes me think we should be more thoughtful about our purpose and audience when invoking active learning too. If we’re trying to sell people on the benefits, outlining some of the limitations might make us more credible. If we’re trying to help people improve their active learning practices, talking about the pitfalls is essential.
Yeah I am really glad you find the credibility point interesting also. I think people often make the mistake of thinking credibility comes from having the answer, rather than having the skills to help people wade through the messiness (which I prefer)
This is a really good reminder to think broadly about how we innovate - and to think clearly and intentionally about the ways in which we need to foreground equity in our thinking. thank you for this!
Scientific American recently released a Podcast series on 'uncertainty in science,' underscoring the idea that uncertainty drives science forward... that 2014 meta-analysis can tell us we're onto something, but subsequent research can refine our theories and models of the 'world' ... but we have to keep our minds open. Loved it.
Totally agree! We are always getting new information. I’m glad you enjoyed.
Yes, this comes from my background in teaching writing & rhetoric 😂 We’re constantly telling students that acknowledging complexity makes them more credible, not less!
Great post. This makes me think we should be more thoughtful about our purpose and audience when invoking active learning too. If we’re trying to sell people on the benefits, outlining some of the limitations might make us more credible. If we’re trying to help people improve their active learning practices, talking about the pitfalls is essential.
Yeah I am really glad you find the credibility point interesting also. I think people often make the mistake of thinking credibility comes from having the answer, rather than having the skills to help people wade through the messiness (which I prefer)
This is a really good reminder to think broadly about how we innovate - and to think clearly and intentionally about the ways in which we need to foreground equity in our thinking. thank you for this!